Children and parents' perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the 'Filling Children's Teeth: Indicated or Not' (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial - a qualitative study.
| Author | |
|---|---|
| Abstract | 
   :  
              The Filling Children's Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children's primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management with best practice prevention (C + P), biological management with best practice prevention (B + P) and best practice prevention alone (PA)-based approaches. Recently, the concept of treatment acceptability has gained attention and attempts have been made to provide a conceptual definition, however this has mainly focused on adults. Recognising the importance of evaluating the acceptability of interventions in addition to their effectiveness, particularly for multi-component complex interventions, the trial design included a qualitative component. The aim of this component was to explore the acceptability of the three strategies from the perspectives of the child participants and their parents.  | 
        
| Year of Publication | 
   :  
              2020 
           | 
        
| Journal | 
   :  
              BMC oral health 
           | 
        
| Volume | 
   :  
              20 
           | 
        
| Issue | 
   :  
              1 
           | 
        
| Number of Pages | 
   :  
              69 
           | 
        
| Date Published | 
   :  
              2020 
           | 
        
| URL | 
   :  
              https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6 
           | 
        
| DOI | 
   :  
              10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6 
           | 
        
| Short Title | 
   :  
              BMC Oral Health 
           | 
        
| Download citation |